Jumper's Knee: Why Progressive Tendon Loading Has Overtaken Eccentric-Only Programs
In this randomised clinical trial, a staged progressive tendon-loading program produced greater improvement in patellar tendinopathy symptoms and function at 24 weeks than traditional eccentric exercise therapy.
Eccentric decline-squat protocols dominated patellar tendinopathy rehabilitation for years, despite requiring athletes to exercise into pain and showing mixed results in competitive, in-season populations. Breda and colleagues' randomised clinical trial, published in the British Journal of Sports Medicine in 2021, tested a pain-guided alternative built on staged, progressive loading.
The investigators randomised athletes with clinically diagnosed and ultrasound-confirmed patellar tendinopathy to one of two 24-week programs. Progressive tendon-loading exercise therapy (PTLE) moved through four criteria-based stages: isometric holds, isotonic strength work, explosive and energy-storage loading, and finally sport-specific training, with progression permitted only when pain remained within an acceptable range. Eccentric exercise therapy (EET) followed the established approach of single-leg decline squats, performed into pain, followed by sport-specific exercises.
At 24 weeks, the PTLE group improved by roughly 28 points on the VISA-P — the standard measure of patellar tendon symptoms and function — compared with roughly 18 points in the EET group, a statistically significant difference favouring the progressive approach. Return to sport was also higher with PTLE (43% versus 27%), while satisfaction and adherence were similar between groups. Notably, neither program fully resolved symptoms for most athletes within six months, reinforcing that patellar tendinopathy recovery is a long game.
For practice, this trial supports structuring rehabilitation as a criteria-driven progression from isometric through isotonic to energy-storage and sport-specific loading, using pain as a guide for progression rather than a target to push through. It also helps set realistic timelines: meaningful improvement builds over months, and return to full training should be earned through tolerance of progressively demanding tendon loads.
Key findings
- Athletes with clinically diagnosed, imaging-confirmed patellar tendinopathy were randomised to progressive tendon-loading exercises (PTLE) or eccentric exercise therapy (EET).
- PTLE progressed through four stages — isometric, isotonic, explosive/plyometric, and sport-specific loading — with progression guided by acceptable pain levels; EET centred on single-leg decline squats followed by sport-specific work.
- At 24 weeks, the improvement in VISA-P score (a validated symptom and function measure) was significantly greater with PTLE (about 28 points) than with EET (about 18 points).
- Return to sport was higher in the PTLE group (43% vs 27%), with no significant differences in satisfaction or adherence between groups.
Clinical relevance
Patellar tendinopathy is common in jumping and change-of-direction athletes, and this trial gives clinicians a clearly staged, pain-guided loading framework with better outcomes than the older eccentric-only standard.
Connected research
Read alongside this article
- Two Ways to Load a Sore Achilles Tendon: Slow Heavy Strength Work vs. Eccentric Heel Drops American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015
- Blood Flow Restriction Training: What the Research Says About Building Strength With Lighter Loads Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2020
Articles that reference this one
- Two Ways to Load a Sore Achilles Tendon: Slow Heavy Strength Work vs. Eccentric Heel Drops American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2015
- Blood Flow Restriction Training: What the Research Says About Building Strength With Lighter Loads Scand J Med Sci Sports, 2020
Source
This article paraphrases the following peer-reviewed publication. Review the original for full methodology and results:
Breda SJ, Oei EHG, Zwerver J, et al. Effectiveness of progressive tendon-loading exercise therapy in patients with patellar tendinopathy: a randomised clinical trial. Br J Sports Med. 2021;55(9):501-509.
Prepared by the Volt Health team as an educational summary of the cited publication. It is not medical advice; assessment and treatment decisions should always be made with a qualified health professional.
Discussion
No comments yet — be the first to share your thoughts.
More from Sport Medicine
What the Latest International Concussion Guidelines Say About Recovery and Returning to Sport
The 2023 international consensus on sport-related concussion moved away from strict rest, endorsing early light activity, a stepwise return to school and sport, and updated assessment tools for athletes of all ages.
Sport MedicineShould Kids Pick One Sport Early? What the Evidence Says About Specializing Young
A review of the evidence found that most elite athletes actually played multiple sports as kids and specialized later, and that intense early single-sport training may raise the risk of overuse injury and burnout.
Sport MedicineOne Simple Exercise That Cuts Hamstring Injuries Roughly in Half
Pooling data from thousands of athletes, programs that included the Nordic hamstring exercise were associated with about half the rate of hamstring injuries compared with programs that did not.